Use the AI Factory rubric or a generic fallback for artifacts, criteria, and sponsor lanes.
Paste a project. Get a judge memo.
ProofRank
Review a public repo against the active hackathon rubric, then decide what evidence is still missing.
Application of Technology, Presentation, Business Value, and Originality. Change the event page in Readiness to load another rubric.
What to fix next
Ranked projects
Select one project to inspect.Evidence checklist
Draft links stay pending until public or Bright Data review runs.Category map
Hackathon ops map Open only when you need the event profile, lifecycle, or reusable judging workflow. Profile · builder · judge · sponsor
Default profile loaded. Paste another event URL in Readiness to review projects against a different rubric.
Share the app, let another builder paste links, then compare that review against the active hackathon profile.
Use the same evidence record before submission, during judging, and after winner selection.
Builder mode
Paste a public GitHub repo and optional demo URL to find missing artifacts, unclear claims, and sponsor-proof gaps.
Judge mode
Use the queue, rubric memo, evidence receipt, and readout to review a field faster and more consistently.
Sponsor mode
Bright Data adds source, search, discovery, and replayable evidence so a prize choice can be defended.
ProofRank is designed to sit beside the whole competition pipeline, not just one submission page.
Check repo, demo, pitch, required tech, and submission readiness before deadline.
Rank evidence-backed projects and separate broken links from entries with sponsor evidence.
Show how Bright Data changed the decision with traceable source/search/discovery.